Commit ffaeb0

2025-03-10 18:43:35 R. Bishop: Added 3x more links to headers
fire suppression.md ..
@@ 31,19 31,19 @@
- **Best For:** Offices, hotels, residential buildings, warehouses.
- **Avoid in:** Data centres, electrical rooms, areas with water-sensitive equipment.
- ### **2. Foam Suppression Systems**
+ ### **2. [Foam Suppression Systems](https://wiki.firesecure.uk/Fire%20Suppression/Foam)**
- **Pros:** Excellent for liquid fuel fires, prevents re-ignition.
- **Cons:** Requires specialized foam agents for different fire types.
- **Best For:** Airports, fuel storage facilities, marine environments.
- **Avoid in:** Areas where water-based suppression is more practical.
- ### **3. Gas Suppression Systems**
+ ### **3. [Gas Suppression Systems](https://wiki.firesecure.uk/Fire%20Suppression/Gas)**
- **Pros:** Leaves no residue, safe for electronics and archives.
- **Cons:** Requires enclosed space for effective operation, high initial cost.
- **Best For:** Data centres, museums, server rooms, telecom facilities.
- **Avoid in:** Open-air environments where gas dispersal is ineffective.
- ### **4. Powder Suppression Systems**
+ ### **4. [Powder Suppression Systems](https://wiki.firesecure.uk/Fire%20Suppression/Powder)**
- **Pros:** Fast-acting, effective for flammable liquids and electrical fires.
- **Cons:** Leaves a residue that can be difficult to clean up.
- **Best For:** Chemical plants, fuel stations, commercial kitchens.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9