**F/2F (Frequency-to-Frequency)** is an access control communication format used in legacy and specialized security systems. Unlike standard Wiegand or OSDP protocols, F/2F **modulates credential data into frequency variations** to transmit information between a card reader and the access control panel. It is commonly found in **older security infrastructures and military or government applications** where tamper resistance and offline functionality are critical.

F/2F was originally developed as an **alternative to Wiegand** and remains in use in **proprietary security systems** requiring compatibility with legacy hardware.

---

F/2F is still in operation today due to its:

- **Legacy System Compatibility** → Many older access control panels still rely on F/2F communication.

- **Tamper Resistance** → More difficult to spoof or intercept compared to Wiegand.

- **Simple Implementation** → Requires only a few signal lines for communication.

- **No Data Encryption Requirements** → Can operate in offline environments where encryption is not required.

However, **F/2F lacks modern security features** like encryption and bidirectional communication, making it vulnerable to interception or replay attacks.

---

F/2F operates by encoding **binary data** as **frequency shifts** rather than direct voltage pulses. Each bit of data is transmitted as a **high or low frequency pulse**, which the controller interprets as `1` or `0`.

1. **Card is Presented** → The reader scans the card and extracts its credential data.

2. **Bit Encoding** → The credential data is converted into a frequency-modulated signal.

3. **Transmission to Panel** → The controller deciphers the frequency shifts and reconstructs the binary data.

4. **Validation & Access Decision** → The panel checks the credentials against a stored database to permit or deny access.

This frequency-based approach allows **F/2F to function reliably over long distances** but is **more susceptible to interference** compared to modern encrypted protocols.

---

F/2F requires **dedicated signal lines** for data transmission, but wiring differs between **supervised and unsupervised modes**.

| Wire Colour | Function |

| ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------- |

| **Red** | +12V DC Power (Optional, if not powered separately) |

| **Black** | Ground (GND) |

| **Green** | Data (Frequency Modulated Output) |

| **White** | Clock Signal (Optional, depending on implementation) |

**Unsupervised mode** does not provide monitoring for **reader tampering or communication failures**, making it less secure.

| Wire Colour | Function |

| ----------- | ------------------------------------- |

| **Red** | +12V DC Power (Optional) |

| **Black** | Ground (GND) |

| **Green** | Data (Frequency Modulated Output) |

| **White** | Clock Signal (Optional) |

| **Blue** | Reader Supervision (Tamper Detection) |

| **Yellow** | Door Status (For advanced monitoring) |

**Supervised F/2F mode** includes **tamper detection and communication monitoring**, improving security and reliability. If a tamper event is detected, the controller can trigger **alarms or disable the compromised reader**.

---

| Feature | Supervised F/2F | Unsupervised F/2F |

| --------------------- | ------------------------- | ------------------------- |

| **Tamper Detection** | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |

| **Reader Monitoring** | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |

| **Security Level** | 🔒 High | ⚠️ Low |

| **Wiring Complexity** | ⚠️ More Wires | ✅ Simpler Setup |

| **Common Use Case** | Government, High Security | Legacy Commercial Systems |

Supervised F/2F is the **preferred option for modern implementations** where **tamper detection and fault monitoring** are critical.

---

Although F/2F provides some tamper resistance, it has several security weaknesses:

- **No Encryption** → Data is transmitted in an unencrypted format.

- **Replay Attacks** → Captured frequency signals can be replayed to gain unauthorized access.

- **Limited Interoperability** → Many modern access control panels do not support F/2F.

- **Susceptible to Interference** → Nearby electronic noise can disrupt frequency-based transmission.

To improve security, organizations should consider **migrating to modern encrypted protocols such as OSDP** or using **multi-factor authentication** to supplement F/2F systems.

---

Organizations using F/2F should evaluate upgrading to **OSDP or encrypted Wiegand alternatives**. The migration process typically involves:

1. **Identifying Existing Infrastructure** → Determine if legacy F/2F readers can be replaced with modern smart card readers.

2. **Upgrading to Secure Protocols** → Transition to **OSDP with AES encryption** for enhanced security.

3. **Deploying Multi-Technology Readers** → Support both **legacy F/2F and modern credentials** for a phased migration.

4. **Implementing Tamper Detection & Monitoring** → Ensure access control systems can detect and respond to reader tampering.

**Multi-technology readers** allow organizations to **gradually phase out F/2F systems** while maintaining compatibility with legacy infrastructure.

---

**F/2F is a legacy access control protocol with limited security features, making it vulnerable to modern attack methods.** Organizations should:

✅ **Evaluate security risks associated with F/2F-based systems.**\

✅ **Upgrade to modern encrypted credential formats such as OSDP.**\

✅ **Use tamper detection and monitoring to enhance security.**

By transitioning from **F/2F to secure communication protocols**, businesses can **future-proof their access control infrastructure while reducing the risk of unauthorized access**.